# Whiskering of pointed homotopies with respect to composition of pointed maps
```agda
module structured-types.whiskering-pointed-homotopies-composition where
```
<details><summary>Imports</summary>
```agda
open import foundation.action-on-identifications-binary-functions
open import foundation.action-on-identifications-functions
open import foundation.commuting-squares-of-identifications
open import foundation.commuting-triangles-of-identifications
open import foundation.dependent-pair-types
open import foundation.homotopies
open import foundation.identity-types
open import foundation.universe-levels
open import foundation.whiskering-homotopies-composition
open import foundation.whiskering-identifications-concatenation
open import structured-types.pointed-2-homotopies
open import structured-types.pointed-families-of-types
open import structured-types.pointed-homotopies
open import structured-types.pointed-maps
open import structured-types.pointed-types
```
</details>
## Idea
The [whiskering operations](foundation.whiskering-operations.md) of
[pointed homotopies](structured-types.pointed-homotopies.md) with respect to
composition of [pointed maps](structured-types.pointed-maps.md) are two
operations that produce pointed homotopies between composites of pointed maps
from either a pointed homotopy on the left or on the right of the composition.
- Consider a pointed homotopy `H : f ~∗ g` between pointed maps `f g : A →∗ B`,
and consider a pointed map `h : B →∗ C`, as indicated in the diagram
```text
f
-----> h
A -----> B -----> C.
g
```
The
{{#concept "left whiskering operation on pointed homotopies" Agda=left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy}}
of `h` and `H` is a pointed homotopy
```text
h ·l∗ H : h ∘∗ f ~∗ h ∘∗ g.
```
- Consider a pointed map `f : A →∗ B` and consider a pointed homotopy
`H : g ~∗ g` between tw pointed maps `g h : B →∗ C`, as indicated in the
diagram
```text
g
f ----->
A -----> B -----> C.
h
```
The
{{#concept "right whiskering operation on pointed homotopies" Agda=right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy}}
of `H` and `f` is a pointed homotopy
```text
H ·r∗ f : g ∘∗ f ~∗ h ∘∗ f.
```
## Definitions
### Left whiskering of pointed homotopies
Consider two pointed maps `f := (f₀ , f₁) : A →∗ B` and
`g := (g₀ , g₁) : A →∗ B` equipped with a pointed homotopy
`H := (H₀ , H₁) : f ~∗ g`, and consider furthermore a pointed map
`h := (h₀ , h₁) : B →∗ C`. Then we construct a pointed homotopy
```text
h ·l∗ H : (h ∘∗ f) ~∗ (h ∘∗ g).
```
**Construction.** The underlying homotopy of `h ·l∗ H` is the whiskered homotpy
```text
h₀ ·l H₀.
```
For the coherence, we have to show that the triangle
```text
ap h₀ (H₀ *)
h₀ (f₀ *) ------------> h₀ (g₀ *)
\ /
ap h₀ f₁ \ / ap h₀ g₁
∨ ∨
h₀ * h₀ *
\ /
h₁ \ / h₁
∨ ∨
∗
```
commutes. By right whiskering of
[commuting triangles of identifications](foundation.commuting-squares-of-identifications.md)
with respect to concatenation it suffices to show that the triangle
```text
ap h₀ (H₀ *)
h₀ (f₀ *) ---------> h₀ (g₀ *)
\ /
ap h₀ f₁ \ / ap h₀ g₁
\ /
∨ ∨
h₀ *
```
commutes. By functoriality of commuting triangles of identifications, this
follows from the fact that the triangle
```text
H₀ *
f₀ * ------> g₀ *
\ /
f₁ \ / g₁
\ /
∨ ∨
*
```
commutes.
```agda
module _
{l1 l2 l3 : Level}
{A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3}
(h : B →∗ C) (f g : A →∗ B) (H : f ~∗ g)
where
htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
map-comp-pointed-map h f ~ map-comp-pointed-map h g
htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
map-pointed-map h ·l htpy-pointed-htpy H
coherence-point-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
coherence-point-unpointed-htpy-pointed-Π
( h ∘∗ f)
( h ∘∗ g)
( htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy)
coherence-point-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
right-whisker-concat-coherence-triangle-identifications
( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f))
( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map g))
( ap
( map-pointed-map h)
( htpy-pointed-htpy H (point-Pointed-Type A)))
( preserves-point-pointed-map h)
( map-coherence-triangle-identifications
( map-pointed-map h)
( preserves-point-pointed-map f)
( preserves-point-pointed-map g)
( htpy-pointed-htpy H (point-Pointed-Type A))
( coherence-point-pointed-htpy H))
left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : h ∘∗ f ~∗ h ∘∗ g
pr1 left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
pr2 left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
coherence-point-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
```
### Right whiskering of pointed homotopies
Consider a pointed map `f := (f₀ , f₁) : A →∗ B` and two pointed maps
`g := (g₀ , g₁) : B →∗ C` and `h := (h₀ , h₁) : B →∗ C` equipped with a pointed
homotopy `H := (H₀ , H₁) : g ~∗ h`. Then we construct a pointed homotopy
```text
H ·r∗ f : (g ∘∗ f) ~∗ (h ∘∗ f).
```
**Construction.** The underlying homotopy of `H ·r∗ f` is the homotopy
```text
H₀ ·r f₀ : (g₀ ∘ f₀) ~ (h₀ ∘ f₀).
```
Then we have to show that the outer triangle in the diagram
```text
H₀ (f₀ *)
g₀ (f₀ *) ------------> h₀ (f₀ *)
\ /
ap g₀ f₁ \ / ap h₀ f₁
∨ H₀ * ∨
g₀ * ----> h₀ *
\ /
g₁ \ / h₁
∨ ∨
∗
```
commutes. This is done by vertically pasting the upper square and the lower
triangle. The upper square commutes by inverse naturality of the homotopy `H₀`.
The lower triangle is the base point coherence `H₁` of the pointed homotopy
`H ≐ (H₀ , H₁)`.
```agda
module _
{l1 l2 l3 : Level}
{A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3}
(g1 g2 : B →∗ C) (H : g1 ~∗ g2) (f : A →∗ B)
where
htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
unpointed-htpy-pointed-Π (g1 ∘∗ f) (g2 ∘∗ f)
htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
htpy-pointed-htpy H ·r map-pointed-map f
coherence-point-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
coherence-point-unpointed-htpy-pointed-Π
( g1 ∘∗ f)
( g2 ∘∗ f)
( htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy)
coherence-point-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
vertical-pasting-coherence-square-coherence-triangle-identifications
( htpy-pointed-htpy H _)
( ap (map-pointed-map g1) _)
( ap (map-pointed-map g2) _)
( htpy-pointed-htpy H _)
( preserves-point-pointed-map g1)
( preserves-point-pointed-map g2)
( inv-nat-htpy (htpy-pointed-htpy H) _)
( coherence-point-pointed-htpy H)
right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : g1 ∘∗ f ~∗ g2 ∘∗ f
pr1 right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
pr2 right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
coherence-point-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
```
## Properties
### Computing the left whiskering of the reflexive pointed homotopy
```agda
module _
{l1 l2 l3 : Level}
{A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3}
(h : B →∗ C) (f : A →∗ B)
where
compute-refl-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
pointed-2-htpy
( left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h f f (refl-pointed-htpy f))
( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f))
compute-refl-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
refl-pointed-2-htpy (refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f))
```
### Computing the right whiskering of the reflexive pointed homotopy
Consider two pointed maps `f := (f₀ , f₁) : A →∗ B` and
`g := (g₀ , g₁) : B →∗ C`. We are constructing a pointed `2`-homotopy
```text
right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy (refl-pointed-htpy h) f ~∗
refl-pointed-htpy (g ∘∗ f)
```
The underlying homotopy of this pointed `2`-homotopy is `refl-htpy`. The base
point coherence of this homotopy is an identification witnessing that the
triangle
```text
H₁
ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁ ------> refl ∙ (ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁)
\ /
refl \ / right-whisker-concat refl (ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁) ≐ refl
\ /
∨ ∨
refl ∙ (ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁)
```
commutes. Here, the identification `H₁` is the vertical pasting of the upper
square and the lower triangle in the diagram
```text
refl
g₀ (f₀ *) ------------> g₀ (f₀ *)
\ /
ap g₀ f₁ \ / ap g₀ f₁
∨ refl ∨
g₀ * ----> g₀ *
\ /
g₁ \ / g₁
∨ ∨
∗.
```
The upper square in this diagram is the inverse naturality of the reflexive
homotopy `refl-htpy` and the lower triangle in this diagram is the reflexive
identification.
Recall that the inverse naturality of the reflexive homotopy
`inv-nat-htpy refl-htpy f₁` computes to the horizontally constant square of
identifications. Furthermore, the vertical pasting of the horizontally constant
square `right-unit` and any commuting triangle `refl` computes to `refl`.
Therefore it follows that the identification `H₁` above is equal to `refl`, as
was required to show.
```agda
module _
{l1 l2 l3 : Level}
{A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3}
(h : B →∗ C) (f : A →∗ B)
where
htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
unpointed-htpy-pointed-htpy
( right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h h (refl-pointed-htpy h) f)
( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f))
htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = refl-htpy
coherence-point-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
coherence-point-unpointed-htpy-pointed-htpy
( right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h h (refl-pointed-htpy h) f)
( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f))
( htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy)
coherence-point-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
inv
( ( right-unit) ∙
( ( ap
( λ t →
vertical-pasting-coherence-square-coherence-triangle-identifications
( refl)
( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f))
( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f))
( refl)
( preserves-point-pointed-map h)
( preserves-point-pointed-map h)
( t)
( refl))
( inv-nat-refl-htpy
( map-pointed-map h)
( preserves-point-pointed-map f))) ∙
( right-whisker-concat-horizontal-refl-coherence-square-identifications
( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f))
( preserves-point-pointed-map h))))
compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy :
pointed-2-htpy
( right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h h (refl-pointed-htpy h) f)
( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f))
pr1 compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
pr2 compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy =
coherence-point-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
```