Proposition. For any sieve RR in JJ, bigger sieve S⊇RS \supseteq R also in JJ [7R33]

Let JJ be a Grothendieck topology on a category C\mathcal{C}. If R⪧JUR \mathbin{⪧}_J U and S⪧US \mathbin{⪧} U is a sieve on UU containing RR, then S⪧JUS \mathbin{⪧}_J U.

Proof [local-0]

The key is this: By definition of sieve, for any element f∈Rf \in R, the set f∗(R)f^*(R) is a maximal sieve of dom(f)\text{dom}(f)! Because let's see

f∗(R)={g∣f∘g∈R}f^*(R) = \{ g \mid f \circ g \in R \}

because elements of RR are closed under composition, f∗(R)f^*(R) is the maximal sieve of dom(f)\text{dom}(f):

f∗(R)={g∣cod(g)=dom(f)}=Mdom(f)f^*(R) = \{g \mid \text{cod}(g) = \text{dom}(f) \} = M_{\text{dom}(f)}

Because all elements of RR also belongs to SS, we have f∗(R)⊆f∗(S)f^*(R) \subseteq f^*(S); but f∗(R)f^*(R) is the maximal sieve of dom(f)\text{dom}(f), hence f∗(R)=f∗(S)f^*(R) = f^*(S).

Recall that maximal sieve of UU belongs to J(U)J(U), implies that for any f∈Rf \in R, we have f∗(S)⪧Jdom(f)f^*(S) \mathbin{⪧}_J \text{dom}(f). We apply property (iii), conclude that S⪧JUS \mathbin{⪧}_J U.